In the name of God, the
Most Compassionate, Most Merciful
Women going to the mosque
is quite controversial these days mainly because in many mosques there are no
or inadequate facilities for the women who wish to pray there.
There are no verses that
directly speak of women praying at the mosque, the discussion is based on
evidence found in the Sunnah and the legislatory tools below it.
General permissibility
for women to attend the mosque
The Prophet's (peace be
upon him) mosque is well known to have been one large space where both women
and men prayed; the genders lining up in separate rows:
"The best rows for
men are the first rows and the worst are the last rows; and the best rows for
women are the last rows and the worst are the first rows." [Muslim].
Since the Prophet (peace be
upon him) allowed women to attend the mosque then it cannot be impermissible
since it is incumbent upon him to mention anything that is.
Recommendation for women
to pray at home
It is well known that
praying at the mosque and in congregation is superior to praying elsewhere and
by oneself. There are some sound hadith that suggest an exception
to this, in the case of women; prayer is superior at home. For example:
“A woman’s prayer in her
house is better than in her courtyard, and her prayer in her own room is better
than her prayer in the rest of the house” (Abu Dawud).
“The best Mosque for a
woman is the inner part of her home.”
(Musnad Ahmad)
The wording suggests that
it is generally permissible for women to pray at the mosque however more reward
is attained by praying at home. As an act of worship (ibadat) the
reason behind this is with God. We could philosophise and start to ask
the ontological question what is 'woman' and what is her relationship with God
and society? But that is beyond the scope of this post (see further post here).
Classical works sometimes
cite this as evidence for it being disliked (Makruh) for women to attend
the mosque. The understanding here is that since praying at home
is recommended (Mustahab) then the exact opposite carries the opposite
ruling ie Makruh. By 'the exact opposite,'
merely praying at the mosque is not what is meant, but rather for a woman to go
to the mosque solely for the purpose of praying in the mosque, since it
disregards the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace be upon him). Anything other
than this is permissible, such as going to a class at the mosque and whilst
there praying, or joining the congregational prayer at the mosque while passing
etc.
Prohibition of stopping
women going to the mosque
There are many hadith that
prohibit stopping women going to the mosque. For example
"Do not prevent
women from attending the mosque, even though their houses are better for
them." [Abu
Dawud]
This hadith confirms
the above and clarifies that the superiority of praying at home should not be
reason enough to prohibit women attending the mosque. In fact the command
form may even suggests obligation; in other words, it is not permissible to
stop women from praying at the mosque. However the wording of this hadith
and others are more in line with that of recommendation, which the scholars of
Islam have seemed to concur with.
The same hadith in a
different narration also has the additional ending "but let them go out
without perfuming themselves," [Abu Dawud]. This adds an exception to
the prohibition albeit merely in an advisory tone; let women attend the mosque except
if they wear perfume. The underlying cause ('illa) here could
be argued as that which is attracting and draws attention, therefore anything
with the same underlying cause is likewise an exception. What is and what
is not, considered as attracting is relative to the cultural norms.
Companions limiting
women going to the mosque
The second Caliph U'mar is
said to have prohibited women from attending the mosque and this was agreed by
consensus (ijma'). However, this is a misunderstanding as he allowed his
wife to continue to attend prayers despite his personal dislike of it and he did not prevent
women attending prayers. Rather he prohibited those that were flirting in the mosque.
see: Did Umar ban women from the mosque?
A’isha (God be pleased
with her) said: "If the Messenger of God had seen what the women of
our time do, he would have forbidden them to go to the mosques just as the
Israelite women were forbidden." (Bukhari and Muslim)
This narration from the Prophet's wife; A'isha,
expresses a change in behaviour for the worse by some women in the
community. This is not general, but specific to a group on account of the
disturbance (fitnah) in the community. It is somewhat speculative
to know what this fitnah was other than assuming it was against Islamic etiquette.
It is certainly quite probable that the new cultures the early Muslim community experienced with is meteoric expansion may have
been quite shocking for the Companions.
The great companion Abdullah ibn Mas’ud used to
say to women at the Mosque during Friday prayers: “Go, your
homes are better for you.” (Tabrani). It is impossible to think ibn Mas'ud would contradict the Prophet (peace be upon him) and so this statement could merely have been a way of teaching. There were many new converts and so either they did not know or perhaps the women of his community started to think it obligatory for them to attend.
The companions do not seem to have added anything new to the Prophet's (peace be upon him) teaching, but merely were more explicit in affirming that those whom were causing a social disturbance (fitnah) were prohibited from attending for the public's benefit owing to the new situation they found themselves.
Fitnah or not?
Fitnah is the main argument
put forward for preventing or discouraging women from attending the mosque, for
example in the authoritative work Al Hidaya (The Guidance) by al Marghinani (d.
1197 CE) it reads:
'Attending the
congregation is considered disapproved for them (women), that is, the young women due to the
apprehension of fitnah. There is no harm if the old women go out (for
the congregation) ...'
The distinction made
between younger and older women is meaning that of sexual desirability rather than literally one's age and so the fitnah described is that of arousing lust. It is difficult to gauge the effect of the perceived fitnah during the time of its writing and even what it actually was, although the discussion does go on to suggest the fitnah is the disturbance women endured by the presence of corrupt (fasiq) men. Confusion arises whether these personal opinions from different times and places are applicable here today.
Incidentally, prohibiting someone for prayers owing to the fitnah they cause is just as applicable to men as it is to women. The greater public's protection takes precedence over an individuals benefit. However, owing to the greater emphasis on men attending prayers at the mosque (generally it is viewed as an emphasised recommendation [Sunnah mu'akkadah], but some have ruled it necessary [wajib]) the fitnah caused would likewise have to be more evident.
Conclusion
Loosely what can be understood from the above is that the emphasis for men to habitually attend congregational prayers at the mosque is not the same for women. Although she may attend as it is permissible; it is a matter of spiritual choice for the individual. However, usual Islamic ettiquettes should be observed by all (men and women) to avoid anything unbecomming of a place of worship, such as being dressed properly and lowering one's gaze.
The fitnah mentioned by some scholars today and of the past does seem somewhat of their own opinion - respected and insightful though it may be - and not from any objective evidence. It would be very interesting to a conduct a modern scientific study to see the effects of womens' presence at the mosque. The fitnah must be a very real and tangeable threat to social harmony for it to prohibit women or indeed anyone else attending the mosque. Relative to the norms of our society, I would argue that such a fitnah does not exist since it is common place to be in mixed environments such as co-ed. schools etc and to see images of beautiful people in advertising etc. Also the corrupt (fasiq) people no longer attend prayers. Therefore the presence of beautiful women at the mosque is not out of the ordinary or likely to give rise to harasment and so to generally class it as a fitnah seems inappropriate.
I would also argue that the ruling of general permissiblity for women to attend the mosque may in modern Britain move to recommendation under the remit of the objective (al Maqasid) preservation of religion; since muslim women may rarely meet and be with other practicing Muslims. It also seems more in keeping with the Divine command to:
{bow your heads with those who bow theirs} [2:43]
The verse is general and applies to all Muslims and whilst it may suggest praying in congregation, it does also mean to be with the people of humility.
The lack of facilities for women in some mosques seems to have no precedent in Islamic Law and it actually causes more harm than the harm it is supposed to be removing. It is common for women to be mobile and so by not having facilities it is forcing them to either pray in the street or even delay their prayers!
This post is not brining something startlingly new, in fact I would argue that the almost paranoid disapproval of women attending the mosque by some is that which is new. As Muslims we need to turn back to our tradition, understand it and then be creative in its application, to do other than this is a type of suicidal obsurdity, as one of my teachers said (phrased in his lovely Lebanese accented English): "you let the women watch TV, go to the market, go to the cafes and restaurants, but the mosque? No way! What is this?"
And God knows best
Tuesday, 29 January 2013
Saturday, 26 January 2013
Islamic Law and its Principles
Shari'ah Law (Islamic Law)
Shari'ah literally means 'a way to a watering place.' It is not only the path leading to God, but is also the path shown by God. All ruilings fundamentally aim to achieve God's pleasure and draw near to Him. Ethically it differs to more Western norms in that an act's moral value does not reside within the act, but rather is relative to the Divine Will. In other words nothing is inherently right or wrong in of itself, making Islamic Law hugely utilitarian.
Islamic Law is broken up into two fundamental areas: acts that are between a person and God (I'badat), and acts that are between people (Muamalat). I'badat include acts of worship like prayer and fasting etc. The evidence from the primary sources is both vast and detailed and it is understood that their reasoning is beyond the human intellect. The Muamalat include social interactions such as business contracts and criminal law etc. Generally the evidence from the primary sources is less detailed and more open to interpretation. The reasoning behind the muamalat can be understood by the intellect and also their application may change if the context changes.
Usul al fiqh (Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence)
{You who believe, obey God and the Messenger, and those in authority among you. If you are in dispute over any matter, refer it to God and the Messenger, if you truly believe in God and the Last Day: that is better and fairer in the end} [4:59]
A brief explanation of the method of deriving rulings follows. The textual proof and arguments for their validity for each source of legislation are beyond the scope of this post.
Al Qur'an
The Qur'an is viewed as containing the totality of the Shari'ah, usually expressed in very general ways. It is viewed as imutable; that the legislation it contains will not change over time.
The Qur'an was revealed over a twenty three year period and legislation was given gradually (tanjim). The verses divide into two distinctive phases; the early Mekkan period and the later Madinan period of the first Islamic State.
Deriving legislation from the Qur'an is complex, verses may be; clear and definitive (Qati') or open to interpretation (Zanni); general ('Amm) in applying to all people and circumstances or specific (Khass) in applying to a specific people or circumstance; abrogating (Nasikh) or abrogated (Mansukh) meaning primarily that one verse explains another, but in a few circumstances it supersedes another. Legislation may be understood linguistically as suggesting obligation, prohibition, recommendation etc. or it may need further clarification from another verse, or the Sunnah or from the occasion of revelation (Azbab ul Nuzul).
Al Sunnah
Sunnah literally means path and has a positive connotaion, technically it refers to the words, deeds and preferences of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). The sayings (hadith) of the Prophet (peace be upon him) are an important part of the Sunnah although are not synonomous with it, for example much of the Sunnah's context can be understood from the Prophetic Biography (Sirah).
The Sunnah, unlike the Quran, is not all mass transmitted (mutawatir), most are single (ahad) transmissions and so the evidence is more probabalistic; narrations are sub-divided into categories of strength of evidence, such as sound (sahih), good (hasan) and weak (da'if). Identifying the strength of a narration is a very complex and labourious process which looks at the reliability of the chains of transmission (isnad) and the text (matn) itself as well as the number of, and differences between, the narrations of the same hadith.
The Prophet (peace be upon him) may be acting in one of three roles and so the application of a narration varies. He may be in the role as the Messenger of God and so any statements or actions are general and applicable to all people, or they may be as head of state and are therefore specific as he is talking to rulers or is referring to elements of governance, or they may be as a judge where he may have ruled on a specific case or be dictating general law for Judges to enact.
Rulings of the Companions
Of the companions around the Prophet (peace be upon him) some stand out as having exceptional understanding (fiqh) of the Law; only some eight are known to regularly have given their legal verdict. As such if an opinion from a companion known for their fiqh is recorded in a sound transmission then it is considered like that of the Sunnah as it is considered transmission of the Law rather than independent reasoning (ijtihad).
Ijma' - Scholarly Consensus
Should the people capable of independent legal reasoning (mujtahid) of the Muslim community all unanimously agree on a matter it is binding on the community. A number of verses and hadith are brought forth to justify ijma' as a source of law, perhaps most striking is the hadith: "My community shall not all agree upon error" [Tirmidhi, ibn Majah, Abu Dawud].
Qiyas - Analogical Reasoning
Literally qiyas means measuring and comparing something, technically it is the extension of a known case (asl) to a new case (far'). It entails identifying the effective cause (i'llah) of one ruling and applying it to another based on the fact they share the same effective cause.
Istihsan - Juristic Discretion
Istihsan literally means 'to approve something or deem something preferable,' technically it means setting aside an analogy in favour of an alternative that fits the principles of Islamic Law of justice and equity in a better way.
The great Hanafi jurist Al Sarakhsi consideres it a mode of avoiding hardship or 'raf' al haraj' as outilined by the verse: {God wants ease for you, not hardship} [2:185] and the hadith: "The best of your religion is that which brings ease to the people" [Ahmad].
It includes an appreciation of:
- al Maqasid: The Objectives of Islamic Law. The great Maliki jurist Al Shatabi famously identifies the five essential objectives - among others - as preservation of religion, life, intellect, lineage and property.
- Maslaha Mursalah: Public interest. Maslaha means benefit and consists of considerations which secure a benefit or prevent a harm, whilst simultaneously being harmonious with the objectives (maqasid) of Islamic Law.
- Sadd al Dhara'i: Blocking the means. Typically this means prohibiting a lawful act when it is expected to lead to an unlawful result.
'Urf - Custom.
'Urf comes from the Arabic root 'arafa (to know) and literally means that which is known. Technically it is the recurring practices that are acceptable to people of sound nature. Customs that do not contravene the principles of Islamic Law are considered authoritative and upheld in law courts.
Categorisation of Actions
Every act in Islamic Law fits into one of five broad categories: Obligatory (Wajib), Recommended (Mustahab), Permissible (Mubah), Disliked (Makruh) and Forbidden (Haram). As an additional point it is worth noting that the general position is one of permissibility and proof must be brought to justify ruling other than that: {He has subjected all that is in the heavens and the earth for your benefit, as a gift from Him} [45:13].
Further Reading
Principles of Islamic Jursiprudence by M. H. Kamali published by the Islamic Text Society, ISBN: 0-946621-82-9
The Four Imams by M. Abu Zahra (trans. A. Bewley) published by Dar al Taqwa, ISBN: 1-870582-41-1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)